Jump to content


Photo

OK it is a long read but here you go, Gov verses RJ Renolds


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 Palm109

Palm109

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,861 posts

Posted 06 December 2017 - 08:43 PM

Department of Justice Lawsuit Against the Tobacco Industry
October 4, 2017

After the massive Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) between states and the tobacco industry regarding fraud associated with the sale and marketing of cigarettes, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) decided to file a similar lawsuit against the industry. In 1999, the DOJ sued the nation’s largest cigarette manufacturers and tobacco trade organizations in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (“District Court”), claiming civil fraud and racketeering violations under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. The violations pertained to: 1) the hazards of smoking; 2) nature of addiction; 3) nicotine manipulation; 4) “light” cigarettes; 5) secondhand smoke; 6) marketing to youth; and 7) suppression of information. The government requested injunctive relief to prevent further fraud, as well as monetary damages to disgorge ill-gotten profits and provide funding for programs dedicated to smoking cessation and public education.

In 2004, the DC Circuit ruled that disgorgement is impermissible under civil RICO provisions, as equitable relief may only “prevent or restrain” future violations, not punish past conduct or wrongdoing. The government continued to seek monetary damages under other claims, proposing a new set of amended remedies in 2005. Much to the concern of public health advocates, the amended remedies contained a drastic reduction in requested relief for cessation program funds. At that time, the American Cancer Society, along with health partners such as the Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids, filed for “intervenor” status in the case for the purposes of being heard on the scope of the proposed remedies. Intervention occurs when a nonparty has a strong interest in the case so that the judge allows them to participate as parties in the case. The District Court granted the request, and public health groups have been intervenors since that time, participating in every phase of the lawsuit as it has continued for nearly two decades.

Federal District Court Judge Gladys Kessler issued a 1,500 page ruling in 2006, finding that, “over the course of more than 50 years, Defendants lied, misrepresented, and deceived the American public, including smokers and the young people they avidly sought as ‘replacement smokers,’ about the devastating health effects of smoking and environmental tobacco smoke, they suppressed research, they destroyed documents, they manipulated the use of nicotine so as to increase and perpetuate addiction, they distorted the truth about low tar and light cigarettes so as to discourage smokers from quitting, and they abused the legal system to achieve their goal – to make money with little, if any, regard for individual illness and suffering, soaring health costs, or the integrity of the legal system.” For a helpful summary of keys points of this landmark decision, see The Verdict Is In: Findings From United States v. Philip Morris Collection (Public Health Law Center, William Mitchell College of Law).

Judge Kessler held that the civil RICO provisions could not be used to force the tobacco industry to pay for smoking cessation and public education programs. However, RICO would permit injunctive relief to prevent and restrain future violations, including a prohibition on certain industry practices and the mandatory disclosure of documents previously withheld from the public. Additionally, cigarette manufactures could be compelled to make “corrective statements” on topics about which they had historically defrauded and deceived the American public. All sides appealed to the DC Circuit, and the court affirmed most of Judge Kessler’s judgment in 2009. A subsequent appeal was rejected by the Supreme Court.

After nearly two decades of litigation, the content of the corrective statements was finalized in late June of 2017.

In October, the parties finally agreed on the details of implementation for the newspaper and television ads required and filed a consent decree with the court detailing where and when the statements will appear. The statements will begin to run in late November. The exact appearance and timing of the statements in cigarette package onserts and on industry websites should be resolved shortly.

 

Here is what the tobacco industry must say:

A.  Adverse Health Effects of Smoking

A Federal Court has ordered Altria, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco, Lorillard, and Philip Morris USA to make this statement about the health effects of smoking.

  • Smoking kills, on average, 1,200 Americans. Every day. 
  • More people die every year from smoking than from murder, AIDS, suicide, drugs, car crashes, and alcohol, combined
  • Smoking causes heart disease, emphysema, acute myeloid leukemia, and cancer of the mouth, esophagus, larynx, lung, stomach, kidney, bladder, and pancreas. 
  • Smoking also causes reduced fertility, low birth weight in newborns, and cancer of the cervix.
  
B.  Addictiveness of Smoking and Nicotine

A Federal Court has ordered Altria, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco, Lorillard, and Philip Morris USA to make this statement about the addictiveness of smoking and nicotine.
 

  • Smoking is highly addictive. Nicotine is the addictive drug in tobacco. 
  • Cigarette companies intentionally designed cigarettes with enough nicotine to create and sustain addiction. 
  • It's not easy to quit. 
  • When you smoke, the nicotine actually changes the brain -- that's why quitting is so hard. 
 
C.  Lack of Significant Health Benefit from Smoking "Low Tar," "Light," "Ultra Light," "Mild," and "Natural" Cigarettes

A Federal Court has ordered Altria, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco, Lorillard, and Philip Morris USA to make this statement about low tar and light cigarettes being as harmful as regular cigarettes.

  • Many smokers switch to low tar and light cigarettes rather than quitting because they think low tar and light cigarettes are less harmful. They are not
  • "Low tar" and "light" cigarette smokers inhale essentially the same amount of tar and nicotine as they would from regular cigarettes. 
  • All cigarettes cause cancer, lung disease, heart attacks, and premature death-- lights, low tar, ultra lights, and naturals. There is no safe cigarette. 
 
D.  Manipulation of Cigarette Design and Composition to Ensure Optimum Nicotine Delivery

A Federal Court has ordered Altria, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco, Lorillard, and Philip Morris USA to make this statement about designing cigarettes to enhance the delivery of nicotine.
 

  • Altria, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco, Lorillard, and Philip Morris USA intentionally designed cigarettes to make them more addictive. 
  • Cigarette companies control the impact and delivery of nicotine in many ways, including designing filters and selecting cigarette paper to maximize the ingestion of nicotine, adding ammonia to make the cigarette taste less harsh, and controlling the physical and chemical make-up of the tobacco· blend. 
  • When you smoke, the nicotine actually changes the brain -- that's why ·---quitting is so hard.
     
E.  Adverse Health Effects of Exposure to Second Hand Smoke

A Federal Court has ordered Altria, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco, Lorillard, and Philip Morris USA to make this statement about the health effects of secondhand smoke.
 

  • Secondhand smoke kills over 38,000 Americans each year. 
  • Secondhand smoke causes lung cancer and coronary heart disease in adults who do not smoke. 
  • Children exposed to secondhand smoke are at an increased risk for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), acute respiratory infections, ear problems, severe asthma, and reduced lung function. 
  • There is no safe level of exposure to secondhand smoke.
 

Still at issue: whether the court can order the corrective statements be posted at retail establishments – or the “point-of-sale” (POS) – for tobacco products. POS displays were originally required under Judge Kessler’s 2006 Final Opinion, but the DC Circuit vacated this remedy on appeal in 2009. The case was remanded back to the District Court with instructions to consider the impact of the displays on the rights of third-parties and clarify the provision accordingly. ACS CAN believes this communication at POS is critical to informing consumers across the country and preventing future fraud.

Public health groups will continue to engage in every phase of this dispute until the truth about cigarettes prevails.

 


  • giveintowin likes this

#2 Palm109

Palm109

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,861 posts

Posted 06 December 2017 - 09:27 PM

Thank you cbdave for bringing this to the light


  • giveintowin likes this

#3 giveintowin

giveintowin

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,566 posts

Posted 06 December 2017 - 10:01 PM

Thanks Buckster for looking into this. You are a thoughtful person from what I can see.

Quit date Thursday 24th October. 2017, 10.10am AEDT.

 

It is a relief to not be killing myself slowly. Every day I don't smoke I am getting stronger.


#4 Palm109

Palm109

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,861 posts

Posted 06 December 2017 - 10:17 PM

well thank you

2m6akye.jpg

 

A fat cat tells no tails !!!!!

YO HO


  • giveintowin likes this

#5 Palm109

Palm109

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,861 posts

Posted 07 December 2017 - 07:36 PM

Man I thought so many more what have something to say about this ?



#6 cbdave

cbdave

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,491 posts
  • quitdate:
    2015-10-03
  • LocationAustralia

Posted 07 December 2017 - 09:09 PM

G'day buckster
I'm amazed as well.
Big tobacco has to admitt, publicly, that it has lied and cheated and manipulated an addictive product that kills all in the name of profit!
Rub thier nose in it I say!
Regards Chris
  • giveintowin likes this
Proud 2015 BadAshes
<img src="http://www.imagecont...0&cost_pack=20"/>



If you have just one you will be right back where you started, and where you started was desperately wishing you were where you are right now. —Marvitta

LIVE like someone left the gate open -unknown

#7 barry

barry

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 72 posts
  • quitdate:
    2017-10-12
  • LocationUSA

Posted 07 December 2017 - 09:27 PM

I'm basically a Libertarian, and not a big fan of Government dictating what citizens can and cannot do (assuming it does not affect others, which cigarette smoking definitely does).  

 

This settlement does effectively nothing.  From a "get the message to the little children and teens" standpoint, it does almost literally nothing.  Running ads between 7 and 10pm local time, on the Broadcast channels.  Really?  Do your kids watch tv then?  Mine sure don't.  They're on xbox or YouTube getting their video content in that timeframe.   And print ads?  Whose children or teens are touching physical media (ie newspapers)?!?

 

so, not really much of anything, even if you are "for" control of this kind of thing by the government.


     image.png?base_img=4&size=0&date_yr=2017

 

     30ksjlf.gif


#8 Palm109

Palm109

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,861 posts

Posted 08 December 2017 - 02:20 PM

Why file suit with the RICO act?  The government tried to keep all the moneys they thought they were going to get, instead it got ruled that it is not within the Rico act to award moneys to educations and prevention. 

 

So this piece of crap ruling is what we got 



#9 Faith

Faith

    Non Smoker

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 880 posts
  • quitdate:
    2017-09-01

Posted 08 December 2017 - 06:03 PM

well thank you
2m6akye.jpg

A fat cat tells no tails !!!!!
YO HO


Awww that cat is too cute 😀😀

event.png



30ksjlf.jpg




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users